Showing posts with label Virginia Woolf. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Virginia Woolf. Show all posts

Monday, November 17, 2025

Don’t Close Your Teeth - Virginia Woolf's Diaries

From lareviewofbooks.org 

Cynthia Zarin traces the rise of fascism through the diary entries of Virginia Woolf, in an essay from LARB Quarterly no. 47: “Security.”

VIRGINIA WOOLF BEGAN KEEPING a diary in 1897, when she was 14. At the time of her death in 1941, at 59, her diaries numbered over 30 handwritten volumes. A collection of excerpts, compiled by her husband, Leonard Woolf, as A Writer’s Diary, appeared in 1953. In the 1970s, the diaries in their entirety began to appear, beautifully edited and annotated by Anne Olivier Bell, the wife of Woolf’s nephew, Quentin Bell. 


The portrait Woolf’s diaries present is of a woman of exceptional discernment who, alongside her creative genius, had a genius for living: a life of family visits and fierce attachments, love affairs, excursions, small triumphs and mishaps, fine weather and rain, and writing, always writing. Between 1915 and 1941, despite bouts of illness that could keep her in bed for weeks, Woolf wrote nine novels, five books of essays, countless reviews and articles, a play, and five volumes of letters. And along the way, it turns out, she traced the rise of fascism: from month to month, and year by year, Woolf first recorded Hitler’s bloviations, then her growing terror. Leonard Woolf was Jewish. By 1941, when she took her own life, the signs indicated that Germany would invade England. When Hitler’s secret “Black Book” was discovered after the war, it listed 2,820 people who would be immediately arrested and handed over to the Gestapo when Britain was invaded and occupied. Leonard and Virginia Woolf’s names were both on it. 


To recognize a tyrant, it helps to have some experience with tyranny. A daughter of the 19th century, Woolf knew coercion when she saw it. Written during Hitler’s rise to power, her late novel The Years (1937) and her book-length anti-war essay Three Guineas (1938)—a rebuke to militarism, patriarchy, and totalitarianism—delineate how the structure of the family can suppress and extinguish the spirit of persons who grow up in its vise, and both texts underscore how domestic tyranny is ever visible in the pitiless mirror of public life. 


It’s not difficult to step from the querulous, demanding Mr. Ramsay of Woolf’s 1927 novel To The Lighthouse—modelled on her own father, the literary historian Leslie Stephen, who became a wheedling tyrant to his daughters after the death of their mother—to Colonel Pargiter, the patriarch of The Years, who terrorizes his children simply by entering a room. For it is Mr. Ramsay and Colonel Pargiter who hold the purse strings, opened to reward the obedient and closed to punish the unruly. The Years begins in 1880 and ends at the “Present Day.” After a series of experimental novels, the book is Woolf’s attempt at realism; perhaps because of this, it’s her most subtly strange and hallucinatory book, as reality at close range tends to yield unsettling visions and surprises—as does any acute record of everyday life. And it is only a step from tyrants like Mr. Ramsay and Colonel Pargiter, fulminating and terrorizing the drawing room in domestic displays of authoritarianism, to a grasping president who wants to be king.


Reading is a curious thing. A book read in a happy fog is one thing; the same pages when the world has turned to ash can be another. I’d read A Writer’s Diary as a teenager, highlighting phrases in yellow marker until the book looked like a honeycomb, but last September, for no reason I can pinpoint exactly, I began reading the unexcerpted volumes of Woolf’s diaries, one by one. At the time, my own anxiety around the November election was growing, not helped by doomscrolling, talking of nothing else, and reading the tea leaves of the polls. As I read, I began to follow a darkening thread woven into the diaries’ shimmering weft of days.


The first mention in the diary of the world starting to skitter is Friday, April 28, 1933. Bruno Walter, the conductor of the Leipzig Orchestra, has just left Germany, a few years after Hitler began decrying the presence of Jewish conductors at the Berlin State Opera. The Woolfs meet him through a mutual friend. She records that Walter “is very nearly mad; that is, he can’t get ‘the poison’ as he called it of Hitler out of him.” He continues, in her recounting:


“You must not think of the Jews,” he kept on saying. “You must think of this awful reign of intolerance. You must think of the whole state of the world. It is terrible—terrible. That this meanness, that this pettiness, should be possible! Our Germany, which I loved, with our tradition, our culture. We are now a disgrace!”


On July 2, 1934, on a hot summer day, before Woolf leaves for an outing with Leonard’s nieces and nephews to the London Zoo, a friend, the writer Osbert Sitwell, telephones. After discussing luncheons and publishers, he bursts out, “[C]an’t anything be done about this monstrous affair in Germany?” Three days before, on June 30, an estimated 1,200 people had been put to death without trial; Bell writes in the notes that among them were people “whom Hitler feared or disliked and seized the opportunity of eliminating—General Kurt von Schleicher, his predecessor as Chancellor of the German Reich, who with his wife was shot ‘resisting arrest’ at his Berlin flat.” Back from the zoo, Woolf records the sensation of cognitive dissonance: 


[T]rying, how ineffectively, to express the sensation of sitting here & reading, like an act in a play, how Hitler flew to Munich & killed this that & the other man & woman in Germany yesterday. […] Meanwhile these brutal bullies go about […] like little boys dressed up, acting this idiotic, meaningless, brutal, bloody, pandemonium.


April 1935 finds the Woolfs planning a trip to the continent. She writes, “It is now almost settled that we shall drive through Holland & Germany, concealing Leonard’s nose.” In May, accompanied by their pet marmoset, Mitz, they drive into Germany. The car in front of them at the border crossing has a swastika on its rear window. In Unkel, banners are strung along the road: “The Jew is our enemy.” As they drive, every village has a painted sign: “Juden sind hier unwunscht.” They spend the summer in the country in Sussex; back in London, on November 20, Leonard is woken up by a man shouting abuses in German under his bedroom window; the Woolfs discuss whether to inform the police. On March 13, 1936, Hitler marches into the demilitarized area of the Rhineland, in violation of the Versailles and Locarno treaties. After a dinner party conversation that evening, Woolf records “a touching belief in English intellectuals” to make sense of current affairs. “But it’s odd,” she continues, “how near the guns have got to our private life again. […] [E]ven though I go on, like a doomed mouse, nibbling at my daily page.” In November, at tea, Lord Cecil, champion of the League of Nations, exclaims: “To tell us that we are to submit to Hitler! Do what Hitler tells us!” 



At the turn of 1937, she is reading Edward Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Her novel The Years is published; The Times of London proclaims it a masterpiece. On July 20, she learns of her nephew Julian Bell’s death: he was struck by a shell fragment while driving an ambulance during the Civil War in Spain. In August, she writes, “[Julian] stalks beside me, in many different shapes.” In October, they visit the beach at Cuckmere, where yellow light on the waves turns them into “a great curled volume roughened of water.” In December, she exclaims, “Oh this cursed year 1937—it will never let us out of its claws.” In the early part of 1938, she finishes writing Three Guineas; on March 12, Hitler invades Austria and installs an all-Nazi cabinet in Vienna. She writes, “A veil of insanity everywhere,” and notes: “When the tiger, ie Hitler, has digested his dinner he will pounce again.” 


A week later, airplanes are droning over the house. At Easter, a “hard blue dry weather with a cold wind”; on May 24, “Hitler […] is chewing his little bristling mustache.” 


Above Monk’s House, where they live in East Sussex, the airplanes look like sharks. On July 7, Martin Freud, Sigmund’s son, who has left Austria after the Anschluss, comes for lunch. A month later, she observes tanks assembled on the hill by Rat Farm like black beetles. On August 17, she writes, “Hitler has his million men now under arms. […] That is the complete ruin not only of civilisation, in Europe, but of our last lap.” Her nephew Quentin is conscripted. On September 28, she observes men digging trenches on Turnham Green in Chiswick. As she walks down Pall Mall, a loudspeaker is advising the purchase of gas masks; on September 30, evacuation of children from London begins. Amid this militarization, she remarks, “One ceases to think about it—that’s all. Goes on discussing the new room, new chair, new books. What else can a gnat on a blade of grass do?” And later, she adds, “Just as in violent personal anxiety, the public lapses, into complete indifference. One can feel no more at the moment.” 


On October 1, 1938, the sky is violet with inky purple clouds. She remarks that it appears that they are to live on cabbages and apples from now on. “In 5 years time we may be saying we ought to have put him, Hitler, down now. These dictators & their lust for power—they can’t stop.” On Sunday, a decree that all poisonous snakes and violent animals in the London Zoo are to be shot. On December 11, Woolf writes that the fate of the Jews obsesses Leonard’s widowed mother, Marie, who later suffers a heart attack. The year turns. At the end of January, the Woolfs visit Sigmund Freud in Hampstead, and he gives her a narcissus. About Hitler, Freud says that it will be a “generation before the poison will be worked out.” By March, German airplanes are flying over London. In August, the museums shut down. On August 30, Woolf records that “mad voice” on the radio; the next day, September 1, 1939, Hitler invades Poland; five days later, at 8:30 a.m., is the first British air raid warning. 


The Woolfs go to Charleston to see Virginia’s sister Vanessa. Woolf writes, “[I]t’s an empty meaningless world now. Am I a coward? Physically I expect I am. Going to London tomorrow I expect frightens me.” In October: “Nightly we’re served out with a few facts, or a childstory of the adventures of a submarine.” In November, they listen on the radio to “the strangled hysterical sobbing swearing ranting of Hitler at the Beer Hall.” After he leaves, a bomb detonates, immediately killing seven people. In January 1940, “there’s a rush, like a mattress falling, as the snow slides off the roof.” In February, the cold is bitter; at dinner with T. S. Eliot, his face a “great yellow bronze mask,” Woolf hears the poet say that “barbarian[s] will gradually freeze out culture.” Woolf’s brother-in-law, Clive Bell, adds that he himself sees the light going out gradually. She “throws some rash theories into the air.” On March 29, house guests at Monk’s House have eaten all the butter. Woolf is rereading Sense and Sensibility. 


On April 9, the Germans invade Norway. It’s a fine spring day. She writes: “Some say this is Hitler’s downfall. I must make this record, for in fact it gives the old odd stretch to the back curtain of the mind.” Airplanes fly overhead. Meat is bad and scarce. A month later, she reports, “Jews beaten up.” Leonard and Virginia Woolf discuss suicide as an option if Hitler invades England. They have decided death by carbon monoxide poisoning. She notes, “Better shut the garage doors,” and comments, “This a sensible, rather matter of fact talk,” then asks herself, “But what is the point in waiting?” On May 25, BBC Radio announces that Amiens and Arras have fallen to the Germans. On June 9, she writes, “I will continue—but can I? […] A gritting day. As sample of my present mood, I reflect: capitulation will mean all Jews to be given up. Concentration camps. So to our garage.” They paper over their bedroom windows. 


On June 6, Woolf learns that a man from the village, a gardener, was found dead from shock on the beach at Dunkirk. On the way to meet her brother Adrian, she checks her pocket for her packet of morphia. The war, she writes, “has taken away the outer wall of security. No echo comes back.” A plane crashes at Southease; the Germans haunt her afternoon walks. On July 5, she records her “idiotic anguish” about being badly dressed at a dinner party, and resolves to visit her dressmaker. A few mornings later, she records the skies over Asheham, “like the green backgrounds in Vermeer & then the little rusty grey church, & the cows, sun beaded, fringed with sun.” In the evening, she can see the trails of the German planes, like feelers of light, the drone like a dentist’s drill. On July 26, listening to the nightly BBC broadcast, she thinks, “And—I had something else to say—but what? And dinner to get ready.”


In August, Woolf hides from an air raid in a haystack. Leonard tells her not to close her teeth. The air hums and saws. “Is it thunder? I said. No, guns, said L.” At the end of the month, they see planes very high up, marked with the German Black Cross. She writes, “It wd [sic] have been a peaceful matter of fact death to be popped off on the terrace playing bowls this very fine cool sunny August evening.” The following day, Vita Sackville-West phones to say that she can’t come to lunch because bombs are falling around her house, Long Barn. In September, the evening is so lovely over the flats and the downs that it is as if she is seeing them for the last time. 


On a visit to London, to their home in Mecklenburgh Square, the couple finds the house next door blown to bits. A mirror hangs from its hinges “like a tooth knocked out.” A week later, a time bomb in the square detonates and makes their house uninhabitable. Woolf notes in the diary that she thinks about violent death; Leonard plays chess with a young British soldier who turns up in the garden. On September 18, she records that the words that come to her mind this morning are “We have need of all our courage.” In October, she publishes “Thoughts on Peace in an Air Raid” in an American magazine, The New Republic:


The Germans were over this house last night and the night before that. Here they are again. It is a queer experience, lying in the dark and listening to the zoom of a hornet which may at any moment sting you to death. It is a sound that interrupts cool and consecutive thinking about peace. Yet it is a sound—far more than prayers and anthems—that should compel one to think about peace. Unless we can think peace into existence we—not this one body in this one bed but millions of bodies yet to be born—will lie in the same darkness and hear the same death rattle overhead.


Woolf reads Jules Michelet’s Histoire de France and writes that “one must drop a safety curtain over ones private scene. Michelet is my safety curtain.” There is no mail delivery. A week later, Vanessa Bell and Duncan Grant’s studios are destroyed, and on the 29th, a bomb drops so close to Monk’s House that Woolf curses Leonard for slamming a window. She remarks: “[N]ow we’re marooned, I ought to cram in a little more reading.” 


Jules Michelet was among the first writers to consider how history is shaped not only by tyrants and kings but also by the thoughts and actions of ordinary men and women. Reading Woolf’s diaries in these past months was my safety curtain, as Michelet was for Woolf—one foot in New York, the other in Bloomsbury. A way to be elsewhere, following routes someone else’s mind has laid down. But as in her reading of Michelet, fear seeped through the curtain weave for me. As the pages diminished, I read more and more slowly. I wanted to hold on; I knew what would happen, in Britain—in 1941, the Blitz killed over 40,000 people—and to Woolf, and I did not want to let her go. How do we read, and reread, knowing what will happen? History is a kind of rereading, and there is no way to make it stop. Oh no, not again! I’ve found myself thinking at a performance of King Lear or The Seagull. When one of my daughters was about 15, reading Anna Karenina for the first time, I watched her progress with trepidation. One afternoon, I heard a shriek from the kitchen and knew she had come to the end of the book. 


We close the book, the performance ends, but history keeps on. Between the Acts, Woolf’s last novel, also ends at the “present time,” in this case, 1939. “Reality too strong,” says Miss La Trobe, the author of a village play, interrupted by warplanes overhead. The questions that Woolf asks are ours: How do we at once resist tyranny and shop for haddock for supper? Should we have the momentary privilege to do both? Three days after the bomb drops close to Monk’s House, she tries to imagine what it would be like to be killed by a bomb: “I shall think—oh I wanted another 10 years—not this and shan’t, for once, be able to describe it.” Above the house, the glittering stars are scattered trinkets. Is it treason, she wonders, to say that the weather is fine as she gazes at the fields and ponders what to make for supper? 


The whistle of bombs overhead is heard for the first time, which she describes as the squeal of “a toy pig escaping.” Bicycling through Lewes, she sees a brown velvet dress in a shop window but resists stopping; in early November, she notes the beauty of a haystack in a flooded field. In December, their surviving possessions arrive from London. Hitler has, she remarks, “obliterated all our books tables carpets & pictures.” They eat pickled eggs. Now that the butter has been gobbled up, Woolf attempts to churn butter from skimmed milk (not a success). In January, the marsh is the colour of an opaque emerald. “Yes,” she writes, “I was thinking: we live without a future.”


Virginia Woolf writes in her diary until March 24, 1941, four days before her death. On March 8, after attending Leonard’s speech in Brighton on the subject of “common sense in history,” she spies a pretty hat and notes, “I will go down with my colours flying,” then writes: “Occupation is essential. And now with some pleasure I find that it’s seven; and must cook dinner. Haddock and sausage meat. I think it is true that one gains a certain hold on sausage and haddock by writing them down.” 


By March 18, 1941, Leonard is concerned that Woolf is unwell. Vanessa Bell, who has come to tea, shares his misgivings. Woolf is taken to Brighton to see her doctor, who advises quiet and rest. On April 2, Leonard is quoted in a cable printed in The New York Times: “Mrs. Woolf is presumed to be dead. She went for a walk last Friday, leaving a letter behind, and it is thought she has been drowned. Her body, however, has not been recovered.” 


Her body washed up, near Lewes, on April 18. Had it not been for the rise of Hitler, would Virginia Woolf have filled her pockets with stones and walked into the River Ouse? It is impossible to say. Six months earlier, she’d written that she wanted “another 10 years.” And three years before that: “These dictators & their lust for power—they can’t stop.” Woolf’s last sentence, written on March 24, 1941: “L. is doing the rhododendron.”


LARB Contributor

Cynthia Zarin’s most recent books are the novels Estate, published November 2025, and Inverno (2024), as well as Next Day: New and Selected Poems (2024). She teaches at Yale.


https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/dont-close-your-teeth/

Sunday, October 5, 2025

The pages of our lives

From observer.co.uk/style

By Anthony Quinn

Diaries can be the most revealing records of who we are. One compulsive diarist introduces the intimate reflections of Audre Lorde, Salvador DalĂ­, Elton John and others

Diaries are shrines to privacy. In an age obsessed with exposure and display, the diary is a refuge for the self and a balm for the soul. “In an increasingly digital world”, as Shaun Usher, editor of the new collection Diaries of Note writes, to keep a diary is “a reminder of the power of writing simply for oneself”. Social media users, take note: there is a healthier (and happier) way to order your thoughts than splurging in public, and you will probably end up a better writer for it too.

I began writing a diary nearly 25 years ago, and the books stretch along an entire shelf in my office: “a multi-volume monster”, as my wife calls it. I can’t remember why I started it, but nowadays compulsion keeps me going. Its usefulness is undeniable, for I notice how stray remarks, anecdotes and momentary gestures tend to reappear in my novels. If you keep a diary, you’re always working, topping up the material of observation that can be adapted years later. There is also, in the re-reading, that strange shock of encountering someone you don’t quite recognise from the person you are now. Diary-keeping furnishes an inadvertent picture not just of what you did but of who you were, and in their pages you may trace the “varieties of the self” as it changes through time. It can be an alarming experience, and makes me the more determined to shield my diary from anyone else’s inspection – at least while I’m alive.

And there’s the rub. A private diary should remain private. Living writers who allow their diaries to be published are surely acting in bad faith, because they sacrifice the essential qualities of the form: intimacy and honesty. There are exceptions to that rule: the London theatre critic James Agate wrote a brilliant sequence of diaries that were published from 1932 until his death in 1947, and his title for them acknowledged their inspiration: Ego. He had high hopes for them too, imagining their place alongside Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn. Alas, for him they fell out of print years ago, and Agate’s name outside of theatrical circles is barely known.

My other favourite diarists all kept theirs as a sideline that would eventually transcend anything they wrote for their day job. Only obligation would induce me to read Virginia Woolf’s novels, but in her diaries she is hair-raisingly good, at once brittle and doubting, droll and majestic. I love James Boswell’s journals for their energy and self-lacerating honesty. Siegfried Sassoon’s war diaries are superb, and even his moany later ones have merit. Arnold Bennett’s journals have a grave old-fashioned beadiness and shed an astonishing light on what literary success used to mean.

                                                                                                    Illustration by Matthew Hancock

All of them feature in Diaries of Note, extracts from which are published on these pages, and whose cumulative force becomes irresistible. Usher nicely mixes tones of voice and types of character, as the best anthologies do. I liked finding Eric Morecambe sandwiched between Henry James and Queen Victoria, and Brian Eno between Elizabeth Smart and Ernest Hemingway. Themes emerge piecemeal. The multiplicity of nature is a frequent prompt. I was beguiled by the strange serenity of the Canadian artist Emily Carr, and by Gerard Manley Hopkins walking outside Oxford and trying out lines already furred with lyricism (“cowslips capriciously colouring meadows in creamy drifts. Bluebells, purple orchis”).

In an entry from March 1842, Frontierswoman Mary Richardson Walker gets through her daily chores – housework, baking – before concluding with magnificent offhandedness: “Nine o’clock P.M. was delivered of a son.” Captain Robert Falcon Scott, doomed with his team by the Antarctic weather, records the heroic farewell of his colleague Lawrence Oates, who said that he “may be some time”.

An earlier explorer, Isabelle Eberhardt, notes in June 1900, “I will only ever be drawn to people who suffer from that special and fertile anguish called self-doubt”, striking a chord that resonates through the book. Doubt is an inescapable part in understanding the self. Mary MacLane, whose frank journals scandalised America in 1902, asks reasonably: “can I be possessed of a peculiar rare genius, and yet drag out my life in obscurity in this uncouth, warped, Montana town?” The place is specific; the yearning universal. The poet George Crabbe puzzles in May 1780 over the need to stitch an elbow in his only coat, while hoping to finish his book: “Sometimes I think I cannot fail; and then … I am again desponding”. In May 1949, a young Susan Sontag asks herself what is preventing her from “taking off”, aside from fear of her family and her mother, and of sacrificing her “books and records”. Would she be sent back home by the police if caught? “God, living is enormous!”

Dying is too, and the disasters of war loom massively in these pages. From Zeppelin raids on London and civil strife in Russia to the D-Day landings and the first atomic bomb, death is everywhere. The enormity of the Holocaust comes back in heartbreaking confessions, notably in the diary of Éva Heyman, a Hungarian girl about to be transported to Auschwitz (“I want to live even if it means that I’ll be the only person here allowed to stay”) and that of a Dutchwoman, Etty Hillesum, bound for the same terminus and brave to the last, pitying not just her fellow prisoners but her Nazi persecutors: “every atom of hate we add to this world makes it still more inhospitable”.

Nobility of spirit is given its proper due by Usher, but I wonder if he’s rather skimped on the other things we read diaries for: mischief, meanness, malice. The Scottish poet William Soutar called the diary “an assassin’s cloak which we wear when we stab a comrade in the back with a pen”, and indeed the phrase furnished Alan and Irene Taylor with a title for their comparable anthology of 2000, The Assassin’s Cloak. Kenneth Tynan, a waspish observer, is here accorded a meagre squib about the existence of ghosts. We don’t always want to see diarists in their best light, which is why I enjoyed Clara Schumann (August 1886) putting the boot into Franz Liszt, who’d died only the day before: “a bad composer”, she sniffs, whose work is “trivial, boring, and will surely vanish completely from the world after his death”. Charming valediction!

I dare say Clara would have been mortified if this judgment had become known. But that’s one of the boons of keeping a diary: the only person who’ll read it, in this life, should be the one holding the pen. Posthumously, who knows? You’d have to be pretty high-minded to reject outright the idea of your diary ever being published, and if it happens that people are shocked by what you’ve written about them, too bad: you will be elsewhere. A good diary should offend, amuse and intrigue. The abiding pleasure for the diarist is that you can write whatever the hell you like, all the time.

Diaries of Note by Shaun Usher (Faber, £25). 

Extracts from Diaries of Note

2 Sept 1952

Salvador DalĂ­

Salvador DalĂ­, born in Spain in 1904, was the mustachioed maestro of surrealism, with a flair for the fantastical in both his life and work. Like his art, DalĂ­’s diary offers an often-baffling journey into his mind, filled with wit, imagination, and the unapologetic quirkiness that made him one of the most memorable artists of his time.

                                                                  Notes and drawings in Salvador DalĂ­’s diary

Again this morning, while I was on the toilet, I had a truly remarkable piece of insight. My bowel movement, by the way, was perfectly exceptional this morning, smooth and odourless. I was thinking about the problem of human longevity, because of an octogenarian who works at this problem and who has just parachuted over the Seine, using a red-silk parachute. My intuition is that if it were possible to make human excrement as fluid as liquid honey, man’s life would be extended, because excrement (according to Paracelsus) is the thread of life, and each interruption or fart is but a moment of life flying away.


It is the equivalent in time of the Fates’ snip of the scissors, who in the same way cut the thread of existence, divide it up and use it. Temporal immortality must be looked for in refuse, in excrement and nowhere else... And since man’s highest mission on earth is to spiritualise everything, it is his excrement in particular that needs it most. As a result, I increasingly dislike all scatological jokes and all forms of frivolity on this subject. Indeed, I am dumbfounded at how little philosophical and metaphysical importance the human mind has attached to the vital subject of excrement. And how distressing it is to note that among so many lofty minds there are quite a few who give vent to their needs like everybody else. The day I write a general treatise on this subject, it is quite certain that I will astonish the whole world. For that matter, that treatise will be the exact opposite of Swift’s essay on latrines.

9 September, 1948

Jack Kerouac

When Jack Kerouac wrote the following journal entry in September 1948, he was 26 and his first novel, The Town and the City, was yet to find a publisher. It would be another seven years until he achieved widespread acclaim with the publication of On the Road.


Got form-rejection card from MacMillan’s. I’m getting more confident and angrier each time something like this happens, because I know The Town and the City is a great book in its own awkward way. And I’m going to sell it. They won’t fool me with their editors who want to skimp everything down to the shallow formulas of this age. How many “forgotten-in-one-month” books must they publish before they realise what they’re doing? Just like the movies, and like countless cheap goods that are used up as fast as they’re produced, they turn out these cheap “topical” or “human-interest-small-village-in-Mexico-representing-the-human-undying-spirit stories” by the week, or books by celebrities, or “angry” novels full of sex and violence. I’m ready for any battle there is, against anybody, in defence of this excellent book I have written, which comes from the heart and from the brain – it being only incidental, in a significant sense, that it should come from my heart and brain – and even if I have to go off and starve on the road I won’t give up the notion that I should make a living from this book: because I’m convinced that people themselves will like it whenever the wall of publishers and critics and editors is torn down. It is they, by Christ, who are my enemies, not “obscurity” or “poverty” or anything like that. It is they, the talking class (trying to rationalise itself out of a base materialism) who are the enemy of the people of this country. It is they who build New Yorks and Hollywoods, and flood our radios with inanity, and our papers and magazines with sterilised ideas… I mean the great “Upper White Collar” class, the Commuters, the Whatnot, the people with snotty “progressive” daughter six years old and sons who call their fathers “daddy”. By God, I guess maybe I ought to go back to Canada. But I won’t – I’d much rather make the rounds with that baseball bat. Tonight I finished and typed the final chapter. Last sentence of the novel: “There were whoops and greetings and kisses, and then everybody had supper in the kitchen.” Do you mean that the folks of this country won’t like this last chapter? – or would it be better if I said, “everybody had dinner in the dining room”. But the work is finished.

21 September, 1978

Audre Lorde

Groundbreaking poet Audre Lorde famously described herself as a “Black, lesbian, mother, warrior, poet”. In 1978, she faced one of the greatest challenges of her life: breast cancer. Following the diagnosis, the day after writing this diary entry, she underwent a mastectomy.


The anger that I felt for my right breast last year has faded, and I’m glad because I have had this extra year. My breasts have always been so very precious to me since I accepted having them it would have been a shame not to have enjoyed the last year of one of them. And I think I am prepared to lose it now in a way I was not quite ready to last November, because now I really see it as a choice between my breast and my life, and in that view there cannot be any question.

Somehow I always knew this would be the final outcome, for it never did seem like a finished business for me. This year between was like a hiatus, an interregnum in a battle within which I could so easily be a casualty, since I certainly was a warrior. And in that brief time the sun shone and the birds sang and I wrote important words and have loved richly and been loved in return. And if a lifetime of furies is the cause of this death in my right breast, there is still nothing I’ve never been able to accept before that I would accept now in order to keep my breast. It was a 12-month reprieve in which I could come to accept the emotional fact/truths I came to see first in those horrendous weeks last year before the biopsy. If I do what I need to do because I want to do it, it will matter less when death comes, because it will have been an ally that spurred me on.

I was relieved when the first tumour was benign, but I said to Frances at the time that the true horror would be if they said it was benign and it wasn’t. I think my body knew there was a malignancy there somewhere, and that it would have to be dealt with eventually. Well, I’m dealing with it as best I can. I wish I didn’t have to, and I don’t even know if I’m doing it right, but I sure am glad that I had this extra year to learn to love me in a different way. I’m going to have the mastectomy, knowing there are alternatives, some of which sound very possible in the sense of right thinking, but none of which satisfy me enough. Since it is my life that I am gambling with, and my life is worth even more than the sensual delights of my breast, I certainly can’t take that chance.

7:30PM. And yet if I cried for a hundred years I couldn’t possibly express the sorrow I feel right now, the sadness and the loss. How did the Amazons of Dahomey feel? They were only little girls. But they did this willingly, for something they believed in. I suppose I am too but I can’t feel that now.

26 September 1773

James Boswell

In 1773, Dr Samuel Johnson, the eminent intellectual and moralist, and James Boswell, a young Scottish lawyer captivated by Johnson’s brilliance (and who would later write his biography), embarked on a journey through the Highlands of Scotland. The night before he wrote the following entry in his journal, Boswell had stayed up until 5am drinking punch with his hosts – a decision he would soon come to regret.


I awaked at noon, with a severe head-ach. I was much vexed that I should have been guilty of such a riot, and afraid of a reproof from Dr Johnson. I thought it very inconsistent with that conduct which I ought to maintain, while the companion of the Rambler. About one he came into my room, and accosted me, “What, drunk yet?” His tone of voice was not that of severe upbraiding; so I was relieved a little. “Sir,” said I, “they kept me up.” He answered, “No, you kept them up, you drunken dog.” This he said with good-humoured English pleasantry. Soon afterwards, Corrichatachin, Col, and other friends assembled round my bed. Corri had a brandy bottle and glass with him, and insisted I should take a dram. “Ay,” said Dr Johnson, “fill him drunk again. Do it in the morning, that we may laugh at him all day. It is a poor thing for a fellow to get drunk at night, and sculk to bed, and let his friends have no sport.” Finding him thus jocular, I became quite easy; and when I offered to get up, he very good-naturedly said, “You need be in no such hurry now.” I took my host’s advice, and drank some brandy, which I found an effectual cure for my head-ach. When I rose, I went into Dr Johnson’s room, and taking up Mrs M’Kinnon’s prayer book, I opened it at the 20th Sunday after Trinity, in the epistle for which I read, “And be not drunk with wine, wherein there is excess.” Some would have taken this as a divine interposition...

10 October, 1794

Martha Ballard

Esteemed midwife Martha Ballard was 50 when she began to keep a diary – a detailed record of life in 18th-century rural America that would grow to 10,000 entries over 27 years. On the day of the this entry, Ballard successfully delivered one of the 816 babies she would bring into the world during her career, but this one was not the smoothest of births. To her frustration, the family had also called on the services of one Benjamin Page, an inexperienced 23-year-old male doctor who had decided to introduce opium when it wasn’t needed.

Birth David Sewalls Son

Cloudy. At Mr Sewalls, they were intimidated & Calld Dr Page who gave my Patient [20] drops of Laudanum which put her into Such a Stupor her pains (which were regular & promising) in a manner Stopt till near night when Shee pukt & they returnd & She was Delivd at 7h Evn of a Son, her first Born. I left her Cleverly at 10 & walkt home. I receivd 12/ as a reward.

15 October, 1930

Virginia Woolf

Aged 15 when she began her first diary, by the time of her death in 1941, English novelist Virginia Woolf had filled more than 30 handwritten volumes with reflections, observations, and personal struggles that offer a window into her complex mind. When she wrote the following entry, Woolf was 48. Two years after the publication of Orlando, she was now working on the second draft of what would become one of her masterpieces, The Waves.


I say to myself “But I cannot write another word”. I say “I will cut adrift—I will go to Roger [Fry, painter] in France—I will sit on pavements & drink coffee—I will see the Southern hills; I will dream; I will take my mind out of its iron cage & let it swim—this fine October”. I say all this; with energy: but shall I do it? Shan’t I peter out here, till the fountain fills again? Oh dear oh dear—for the lassitude of the spirit! Rarely rarely comest thou now, spirit of delight. You hide yourself up there behind the hotel windows & the grey clouds. (I am writing this with a steel pen which I dip in the ink, so as to forestall the day when my German pens are extinct). It is dismal to broach October so languidly. I rather think the same thing happened last year. I need solitude. I need space. I need air. I need the empty fields round me; & my legs pounding along roads; & sleep; & animal existence. My brain is too energetic; it works; it throws off an article on Christina Rossetti; & girds itself up to deal with this & that.

17 October, 2016

Lionel Barber

Alexei Navalny was Russia’s most prominent opposition leader – a fierce critic of Vladimir Putin who, in 2024, after years of imprisonment, paid the ultimate price for his defiance. This diary entry was written in 2016 by Lionel Barber, then editor of the Financial Times, during a visit to Moscow.


Moscow

The dimly lit office of Russia’s most famous political opponent of Vladimir Putin is located on the third floor of a shopping mall in central Moscow. Alexei Navalny is a tall, burly man with a spiky cowlick fringe, piercing pale-blue eyes and the hint of a paunch. He speaks good English, with a heavy accent. Friendly but watchful, he is dedicated to a twin mission: to expose state corruption and mount a serious bid for the Russian presidency in the 2018 election. “Please, do not describe me as a dissident,” he tells his FT visitors. “A dissident does not take part in the political system. I want to take part in the presidential election.” Navalny has been arrested, beaten and jailed. His brother, he notes with a shrug of broad shoulders, has been stuck in a prison psychiatric ward in the latest official bid to shut him up. Navalny’s courage is not at issue, even if his political company is sometimes less than savoury. Apart from attracting a cult status among Russia’s youth following, he has also won support from ultra-nationalists, a charge met with another shrug of the shoulders. The goal, he insists, must be to use every inch of political space which Putin has afforded the opposition, from the nationalists to the liberals.

To that end, Navalny and his team are using social media and data analytics to build a serious campaign. A video exposĂ© of prime minister Dmitry Medvedev’s secret property empire near the Black Sea, along with vineyards and yachts, has attracted 24 million views. As we exit past a row of young workers head-down over laptop computers, Navalny points to a tabulated list of all his supporting groups around Russia. He has 130,000 dedicated campaign volunteers, tens of thousands of activists who have shown up for protests, and more than 1.7 million subscribers to his online video channels. Proud and defiant, Navalny is the last (visible) man standing in opposition to Vladimir Putin.

27 October, 1969

Elton John



In October 1969, Elton John was yet to become the superstar we now know. Still only 22, his debut album had been out for four months, and it would be another three years until he legally changed his name from Reginald Dwight.

SESSION DE LANE LEA 9:00 BOBBY BRUCE

STAYED HOME TODAY.

WENT TO SOUTH HARROW MARKET

THE SESSION WAS HILARIOUS.

DIDN’T NO ANYTHING IN THE END

WROTE ‘YOUR SONG’

                                                                                A momentous day for Elton John


1 November, 1868

Louisa May Alcott

The second volume of Little Women, a seminal work in both American literature and feminist canon, came on 1 January 1869, two months after Louisa May Alcott wrote the following entry in her diary.


Began the second part of Little Women. I can do a chapter a day, and in a month I mean to be done. A little success is so inspiring that I now find my “Marches” sober, nice people, and as I can launch into the future, my fancy has more play. Girls write to ask who the little women marry, as if that was the only end and aim of a woman’s life. I won’t marry Jo to Laurie to please any one.

Edited extracts from Diaries of Note: 366 Lives, One Day at a Time edited by Shaun Usher, published by Faber & Faber on 9 October. Salvador Dalí: from Diary of a Genius, translated from the French by Richard Howard © Éditions de La Table Ronde, 1964. Jack Kerouac: from Windblown World: The Journals of Jack Kerouac 1947-1954, edited by Douglas Brinkley (Penguin) © 2004 by The Estate of Stella Kerouac, John Sampas, Literary Representative. Audre Lorde: from The Cancer Journals (Aunt Lute Books) © 1997 by Audre Lorde estate. All Rights Reserved. Virginia Woolf: from The Diary of Virginia Woolf (Granta Books) © 1982 by Quentin Bell and Angelica Garnett. Elton John: from Elton: The Biography (Andre Deutsch) © David Buckley. Reproduced with permission of Hachette. Lionel Barber: from The Powerful and the Damned (WH Allen) © Lionel Barber 2020. Reprinted by permission of Penguin Books Limited.

https://observer.co.uk/style/features/article/the-pages-of-our-lives